New research is raising concerns about a surprising household culprit that may be quietly increasing our risk of type 2 diabetes: exposure to “forever chemicals.” These man-made substances, scientifically known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), have long been associated with serious health problems. Now, a new study adds type 2 diabetes to that troubling list. With PFAS commonly found in non-stick cookware, food packaging, and even drinking water, the findings are prompting renewed calls for environmental awareness and individual action.

The study, conducted by researchers analyzing data from a small but ethnically diverse group of patients at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, found a significant correlation between elevated PFAS levels and increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Specifically, individuals with higher concentrations of these chemicals in their blood showed up to a 31% greater likelihood of developing the disease. The researchers noted that this link may be due to PFAS disrupting key metabolic and amino acid pathways that help regulate blood sugar and inflammation.

Dr. Don Thushara Galbadage, an associate professor of public health at Texas Christian University, explained that these pathways are essential for maintaining a healthy metabolic balance. “When PFAS disrupt these pathways, the body’s ability to manage blood sugar, inflammation, and energy balance may not work properly,” he said. For example, disruptions in glutamate metabolism have been previously linked to obesity and insulin resistance, both of which are known precursors to type 2 diabetes.

Forever chemicals have earned their nickname due to their persistence in the environment and the human body. Unlike many other compounds, PFAS do not break down over time. They accumulate in soil, water, and living organisms, making them a long-term concern. In addition to the newly identified diabetes risk, PFAS have been tied to cancer, thyroid disease, infertility, and even brain cell damage.

One aspect I found particularly striking is how these chemicals can influence health outcomes even in people without traditional diabetes risk factors. As Dr. Galbadage noted, “Type 2 diabetes is not solely an inherited disease, but one driven by lifestyle and external factors, including environmental exposures, as this study showed.” This insight challenges the common perception that genetics and diet are the primary drivers of the disease and underscores the importance of environmental health in chronic disease prevention.

The study’s implications are especially relevant for communities with high PFAS exposure, which, according to Galbadage, are often low-income or socioeconomically marginalized. These populations may face a disproportionate health burden due to environmental factors beyond their control. Addressing this issue requires more than individual action—it calls for systemic change through policy, corporate accountability, and environmental cleanup efforts.

While the study's findings are compelling, experts caution that its relatively small sample size means further research is needed. Dr. Grant Fowler, chair of family medicine at the Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, emphasized the importance of larger studies to validate these results. Still, he acknowledged that the research adds to a growing body of evidence linking PFAS to serious health conditions.

Fortunately, there are practical steps individuals can take to reduce their exposure to PFAS. Galbadage recommends using water filters that remove PFAS, replacing non-stick cookware with alternatives like cast iron or stainless steel, and choosing PFAS-free cosmetics, clothing, and cleaning products. Reducing takeout food that comes in grease-resistant packaging can also help. As Dr. Fowler put it, “Think of it like minimizing secondhand smoke exposure. Limiting PFAS in your environment lowers your long-term risk.”

In addition to limiting exposure to environmental toxins, there are well-established strategies for reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes. Maintaining a healthy weight and engaging in regular physical activity—at least 150 minutes per week—can significantly improve insulin sensitivity. “Any exercise is helpful,” said Dr. Fowler. “It immediately lowers insulin resistance in your muscles, which helps you use less insulin and preserves your ability to produce insulin.”

For those already at risk, such as individuals with prediabetes, medical interventions can complement lifestyle changes. A primary care provider can perform blood tests to assess risk and recommend appropriate medications if needed. Galbadage also highlighted the potential benefits of a fiber-rich diet. Emerging research suggests that gel-forming fibers, such as oat beta-glucan, may help reduce blood levels of PFAS, offering another avenue for prevention.

This study adds a new dimension to our understanding of how environmental factors influence chronic disease. It also reinforces the idea that public health is intricately connected to environmental health. As Galbadage concluded, “Diabetes prevention is not just personal—it needs to involve both health policy and environmental action.”

While the presence of PFAS in everyday items is concerning, awareness and informed choices can help mitigate some of the risks. As research continues, both individuals and policymakers have a role to play in reducing exposure and protecting public health. For now, taking steps to limit contact with these persistent chemicals, while embracing healthy lifestyle habits, offers a proactive path forward.

Read more at prevention.com