Thousands Impacted by Faulty Diabetes Blood Tests in NHS Alert
Guest Contributor
Thousands of NHS patients are now facing the unsettling news that they may have been misdiagnosed with type 2 diabetes due to faulty blood test results. At least 55,000 blood tests must be redone after machines used to measure blood glucose levels produced inaccurate readings. The machines in question were manufactured by Trinity Biotech, a company based in the United States and Ireland. As a result of these errors, some individuals may have been prescribed medications they did not actually need.

Concerns about the accuracy of these tests were first reported in April 2024 by the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The machines are used to perform the haemoglobin A1C test, a standard procedure for diagnosing and monitoring type 2 diabetes. This test measures the average blood sugar level over a period of time, and plays a critical role in managing the condition effectively. Inaccurate results can lead to misdiagnosis, unnecessary treatments, and emotional distress for patients who are told they have a chronic illness when they do not.

The issue initially came to light last year at the Bedfordshire NHS Foundation Trust, which operates a laboratory at Luton and Dunstable Hospital. At that time, the trust acknowledged that some patients might have received elevated blood glucose readings and potentially incorrect diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. The trust issued an apology for the emotional distress and inconvenience caused. Now, NHS England has confirmed that 16 hospital trusts across the country were using the same machines, potentially affecting thousands more patients.
According to NHS diabetes national clinical director Dr Clare Hambling, the clinical risk of harm to patients is considered low. “Being potentially misdiagnosed with any long-term condition, such as type 2 diabetes, is understandably worrying,” she said. “However, less than 10 per cent of NHS laboratories were affected and all have either replaced the machines or addressed calibration issues following MHRA advice in July.” She added that any patient requiring a repeat test will be contacted by their GP or local hospital.
I found this detail striking: the scale of the issue is significant, yet the response has been measured and focused on minimizing harm. The NHS and MHRA appear to have acted swiftly once the problem was identified, advising affected laboratories to recalibrate or replace the problematic machines. The fact that only a portion of NHS labs were impacted is somewhat reassuring, though for the individuals involved, even a low risk can feel deeply personal.
Trinity Biotech, the manufacturer of the faulty testing equipment, has stated that it is working closely with the UK health regulator and has reached out to all hospitals using the machines. In a statement reported by the BBC, the company said, “The company has worked closely with the MHRA to resolve the issues experienced by some UK labs using the system.” The Independent has also contacted Trinity Biotech for further comment, though no additional details were provided at the time of reporting.
For patients, the most immediate concern is whether they were among those affected. NHS England has emphasized that those who need a retest will be informed directly by their GP or local hospital. This targeted approach aims to avoid unnecessary anxiety for those not impacted, while ensuring that those who are receive accurate diagnoses and appropriate care.
This incident highlights the critical role that accurate diagnostic tools play in patient care. A misdiagnosis of type 2 diabetes can lead to lifestyle changes, medication, and psychological stress, all based on incorrect data. It also underscores the importance of regulatory oversight and swift corrective action when medical equipment fails to perform as expected.
In the broader context of healthcare technology, this situation serves as a reminder that even widely used and trusted systems can experience issues. Ongoing monitoring, maintenance, and transparent communication are essential to maintaining public trust. While the current clinical risk is deemed low, the NHS’s proactive approach in addressing the issue and contacting affected patients is a vital part of restoring confidence.
As the situation continues to unfold, patients are encouraged to speak with their healthcare providers if they have concerns about their test results or treatment plans. Ensuring that individuals have access to accurate information and support is key to managing both the medical and emotional impact of this event.