Mother Says Placing Her Autistic Teen in a Group Home Was the Most Heartbreaking Choice Her Family Ever Made

On the left, a young boy reaches out to touch his shadow on a metal wall outdoors; on the right, a child sits alone on a floor, hugging his knees.

When is it time to stop living with your autistic teen, and how do you live with that decision afterward? It is a question many families quietly wrestle with, especially those raising a teen with Level 3 autism spectrum disorder. The original author of this story describes a turning point that was not a single dramatic day, but a long stretch of exhaustion, fear, and heartbreak that finally made placement in a group home the safest and most humane option for everyone involved.

Griffin is the middle child in a family of five, the boy half of a set of boy and girl twins. He is described as a teenager with big hands and a rare, dimpled smile. On Sundays he tromps into his parents’ house with a fast food bag and a soda, drops his blue backpack in the hallway, and accepts a hug he only half returns. Those weekly visits are a reminder of how much he is loved, and also of how drastically life has changed since his parents decided he needed to move into an Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities, more commonly called a group home.

A young child wearing black headphones gazes through a window, resting one hand against the glass.

That decision came when Griffin was 17. He has what the DSM-V calls Autism Spectrum Disorder, Level 3, sometimes referred to as severe or classic autism. He is mostly nonverbal, has an extreme form of pica that makes him want to eat inedible and often dangerous items, and continues to wear diapers despite years of toilet training attempts. Before he moved out, adolescent hormones and a rapid increase in his size collided with these challenges and created daily crisis conditions in the home.

The author reports that during the year leading up to his placement, Griffin’s behavior became violent, sexually aggressive, and deeply distressing. He sometimes smeared his own feces. He lashed out physically at his parents, most often at his father, Jeff, who tried to restrain him just enough to protect everyone else without harming Griffin. There were bruises on Griffin’s arms from those struggles. His mother describes being kicked in the face, punched in the stomach, and constantly on alert to prevent him from injuring his siblings or himself.

A young boy sits curled up on a wooden floor in a corner, looking downcast and withdrawn.

Home, for that period, stopped feeling like home. It felt, in the author’s words, like being prisoners in a war zone. The unspeakable became common. She recounts walking into Griffin’s room one morning and finding that he had removed his clean diaper, defecated in his bed, and smeared feces on his face and hands. Cleaning him, his bedding, his mouth, and scraping under his fingernails required her to shove down every instinctive feeling of disgust and simply function as his caregiver. She notes that in the process she began narrating her life in second person, as if that distance might make the reality easier to bear.

There were still fleeting moments of humor. One evening during an intense episode, Griffin was attempting to attack his siblings when Jeff blocked him. Griffin placed his large hand on his father’s wrist and raised his other fist. In a burst of inspiration, Jeff shouted, “Not today, Zurg!” echoing Buzz Lightyear. The absurdity startled Griffin, who let go and wandered away. For the rest of that night they were able to defuse repeated surges of aggression with that same line. It never worked again, but the small absurd moment lingered as a reminder that even in chaos they were still a family trying to cope.

Eventually the escalating aggression, constant supervision needs, and toll on the other children became unsustainable. The author now believes she should have tried harder to secure placement earlier, for Griffin’s safety and for everyone else’s. Yet when he did move into the group home, the relief was braided tightly with grief and guilt. A week later she found herself crying in the grocery store because she no longer needed to buy lactose free milk or Pop-Tarts, small staples of Griffin’s life that used to automatically go into the cart.

A young boy in a gray hoodie reaches out to touch his shadow on a white metal wall.

For the first six months after his move, she says she cried every time she saw him. She missed him. She worried about him. She felt crushed by guilt and by the relief of no longer living with the daily fear of violent episodes. On Sundays, when he walked through the door for visits, she would instantly begin a mental checklist of criticisms aimed at the group home: Was his hair cut? Had he been shaved? Were his fingernails clean? How chewed up was his shirt? Was he wet and not changed?

Yet even as she tallied the ways the staff did not meet her exacting standards, she had to acknowledge that they were managing things she herself could not. They had eyes on him 24 hours a day. They could maintain supervision at a level that she and her husband simply could not match while raising four other children and working full-time jobs. No matter how fierce a parent’s love might be, love alone cannot replace staffing ratios, training, and the sheer stamina needed to provide constant care.

The author is clear that placement in a group home was the best thing for her family and for Griffin. This is a subtle but important reframing of what many parents of autistic teens fear will be seen only as “giving up.” In her account, it is not abandonment. It is acknowledging that her son’s needs had surpassed what a single household could safely and sustainably provide. It is also acknowledging that siblings deserve safety and peace, and that parents’ mental health matters.

Still, she finds it hard not to react when Griffin’s first request during his Sunday visits is to pull out a calendar and make her point to all the Sundays ahead, reassuring him that he will be coming back. Of course he longs for her, and she longs for him. The bond is unchanged. What has changed is the setting. Home, in the sense of full-time residence, is no longer the right place for him, even if it remains a cherished place to visit.

There is also an element of systemic frustration in her story. Griffin has been on a waiting list for nine years for funding that would provide support to keep him living at home. She expects his name to finally reach the top in another year or two. However, she now plans to decline when that day comes. For her, any support that might have changed the trajectory would have needed to arrive long before things spiraled into crisis. Once the family reached this new equilibrium, with Griffin safely supported in a residential setting, it no longer made sense to try to recreate a situation that had become traumatic for everyone.

In the end, her story is not a simple argument for or against group homes for autistic teens. It is an honest portrayal of what it looks like when love meets limits, and when a family chooses long-term safety and stability over an idealized vision of what parenting a disabled child is supposed to look like. Decisions like this are deeply personal. This account offers one family’s reality with Level 3 autism, and a reminder that sometimes the most loving choice is the one that finally allows everyone, including the autistic teen, to breathe.

Read more at https://www.scarymommy.com/when-its-time-to-stop-living-with-your-autistic-teen

Back to blog
Customers Also Viewed

Up To 65% Off on 150+ Items!

Recommended Just For You
Recently Viewed & Trending Items