Stop the Torture of Animals in Australian Labs Now

1,762 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

5.873333333333333% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

Hundreds of thousands of animals are suffering in secret across Australia—demand action now to stop the pain, expose the truth, and protect those who cannot fight back.

Close-up of a brown-and-white dog looking through metal cage bars, its eye visible between the wires.

Each year in Australia, more than 845,000 animals are used in scientific research, many in experiments that cause severe pain, long-term distress, or lasting harm.1 These animals—dogs, mice, pigs, rabbits, monkeys, and others—live and die inside laboratories, often unseen by the public and largely unprotected by meaningful oversight.

What happens to them is not rare or accidental. It is routine. And it is happening under a national code that lacks strong enforcement, independent monitoring, and clear limits on suffering.

A System That Relies on Trust, Not Accountability

Australia does not have a single, transparent national system that tracks how animals are used in research.2 Reporting varies by state. Some data is incomplete. Some is never made public. In many cases, animals bred for experiments are not counted at all.

Ethical decisions are often left to internal committees within the same institutions conducting the research. According to investigations by The Guardian, inspections are infrequent and usually triggered only after complaints are made.1 This leaves countless animals vulnerable to prolonged suffering without meaningful external scrutiny.

Painful Practices Continue Despite Available Alternatives

Animals in Australian labs are subjected to invasive surgery, toxic exposure, forced stress tests, and deliberate infection.3 Some endure repeated procedures over months or years. Others are euthanised after experiments end.

At the same time, non‑animal research methods—such as human cell testing and computer-based models—continue to advance. Yet they remain underused and underfunded, while harmful animal experiments persist by default rather than necessity.4

The Public Expects Better

Surveys show that Australians support research only when it is humane, necessary, and transparent.5 That expectation is not being met. Compassion is not a radical demand. It is a basic ethical standard.

Animals used in research are sentient beings. They feel fear. They feel pain. A system that allows unnecessary suffering without firm safeguards fails both animals and the public.

Now Is the Time to Act

We are calling on the National Health and Medical Research Council to immediately review and update its code governing animal research. This review must include enforceable standards, independent monitoring, and clear bans on practices that cause unnecessary suffering.

Change will not happen quietly or automatically. It requires public pressure. Add your name. Demand accountability. Help push Australia toward a research system grounded in humanity, responsibility, and respect for life.

Sign the petition today.

More on this issue:

  1. Melissa Davey, The Guardian (7 January 2026), "Australia urged to strengthen animal research rules as 845,000 animals used in labs."
  2. Animal Free Science Advocacy (n.d.), "Statistics of Animal Use in Research in Australia."
  3. RSPCA Australia (n.d.), "What is the RSPCA’s View on the Use of Animals in Research?"
  4. Animals Australia (n.d.), "Background on Animal Testing."
  5. ANZCCART (n.d.), "Community Attitudes to Animal Research Survey."

The Petition

To the Chief Executive Officer, National Health and Medical Research Council,

We write to call for an immediate and comprehensive review and update of the National Health and Medical Research Council’s Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. Current standards no longer reflect community expectations, scientific progress, or the moral responsibility owed to sentient beings subjected to research in Australia.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of animals are used in laboratories under this code. Many experience invasive procedures, prolonged confinement, psychological distress, or repeated interventions that result in avoidable suffering. While the code is intended to minimise harm, its reliance on self-regulation and internal ethics committees has created serious gaps in accountability, transparency, and enforcement.

We urge the NHMRC to strengthen the code through clear, binding enforcement mechanisms. Ethical standards must not be aspirational guidelines alone. They must be supported by mandatory compliance requirements, independent oversight, and meaningful penalties for breaches. Without these measures, protections for animals remain inconsistent and ineffective.

Robust monitoring provisions are equally essential. This includes routine, unannounced inspections of research facilities by independent authorities, public reporting of animal use and welfare outcomes, and national consistency in data collection. Transparency is a prerequisite for trust. The public has a right to know how animals are used in research conducted under publicly endorsed frameworks.

We also call for explicit prohibitions on practices that cause unnecessary or prolonged suffering, particularly where non‑animal alternatives exist. Advances in human‑based research methods, computer modelling, and in‑vitro technologies make it possible to replace or significantly reduce animal use in many areas. The code must reflect this reality by prioritising replacement, reduction, and refinement in practice, not just in principle.

At the heart of this issue is compassion. Animals used in research are living, feeling beings. A humane society does not accept suffering as routine or invisible. Ethical science and humane treatment are not opposing goals; they are inseparable. Upholding humanity in research strengthens both scientific integrity and public confidence.

By updating the code with enforceable standards, independent monitoring, and firm limits on harmful practices, the NHMRC can lead Australia toward a more ethical and responsible research system. These actions will protect animals, support better science, and help ensure a future grounded in compassion, accountability, and respect for life.

Sincerely,