Thank you for signing!

Hold Private Shelters To Their Promise To Care For Pets

136 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

0.4533333333333334% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

When public shelters transfer pets to private rescues, those animals should not vanish from public accountability.

Close-up of a dog inside a kennel with metal bars, looking up with wide eyes beside two empty food bowls.

Animal rescues can save lives. Public shelters often rely on private rescues and sanctuaries to take in dogs, cats, and other animals that need more time, medical care, behavioral support, or placement help. But once an animal leaves a public shelter, California does not have a strong statewide system requiring every private rescue to report what happened next.

The investigation into Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna, California, shows why that gap can be devastating. The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office said it began investigating Miranda’s Rescue in April 2026 after receiving credible information about alleged felony animal abuse, animal cruelty, fraud, and conspiracy.1

Investigators recovered 117 intact canine remains from two dig sites, as well as 21 canine skulls, hundreds of bones, and six loose microchips in another nearby dig location.2

Hundreds Of Animals Remain Unaccounted For

Officials said 70 of the recovered dogs were X-rayed on site and that many showed evidence of bullet fragments. USDA and forensic veterinarians preliminarily determined the cause of death for many examined animals to be gunshot wounds. Most of the recovered dogs were microchipped, and analysts are working to identify them.2

More than 600 dog collars were found near a barn investigators believed may have been where dogs were killed.3 The case remains an active investigation, not a conviction. But the scale of the findings raises an urgent policy question: why should hundreds of shelter-transfer animals be able to become unaccounted for before state oversight intervenes?

Sheriff William Honsal said investigators had identified more than 900 animals transferred to Miranda’s Rescue since January 2025, but had confirmed only 116 adoptions, leaving more than 700 animals unaccounted for.4

California Needs Rescue Oversight Before More Animals Vanish

California already recognizes that charity oversight matters. The California Attorney General regulates charities and professional fundraisers to protect charitable assets and prevent donations from being misapplied or squandered through fraud.5 But charity filings are not the same as animal welfare oversight.

California also considered AB 631, a shelter transparency bill that would have required shelters to collect and publish intake, source, and outcome data for animals, including whether animals were adopted, transferred, euthanized, died in care, or were returned to owners. The bill was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee in 2025.6

That kind of transparency should be strengthened and expanded. Private rescues that accept public shelter transfers should be licensed, inspected, and required to report outcomes for every animal. Public shelters should be required to use written transfer agreements, verify rescue standing, reconcile microchips, and suspend transfers to any rescue that fails to account for animals.

A “rescue” label should never be enough to remove pets from public accountability.

Sign now to urge California leaders to require oversight, inspections, and outcome reporting for private animal rescues.

More on this issue:

  1. Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office, County of Humboldt (2 May 2026), “Miranda’s Rescue Investigation.”
  2. Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office, County of Humboldt (26 June 2026), “Miranda’s Rescue Investigation Update.”
  3. Associated Press (28 June 2026), “At least 117 dead dogs found in ‘horrific scene’ at California ‘no-kill’ shelter.”
  4. SFGATE (24 June 2026), “FBI exhumes dead animals at NorCal rescue, hundreds more feared missing.”
  5. California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, “Charities.”
  6. California Legislature / LegiScan, “AB 631: Animals: animal shelters: transparency.”
  7. Best Friends Animal Society, “Improve shelter reporting and data transparency in California.”
  8. Animal Rescues for Change (21 April 2026), “Help Reintroduce Shelter Transparency Bill.”

The Petition

To the Governor of California, California Attorney General, California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary. California Assembly Agriculture Committee Chair, California Assembly Business and Professions Committee Chair, California Senate Public Safety Committee Chair, California Senate Agriculture Committee Chair, and California county animal services directors,

I urge you to require oversight, licensing, inspections, and outcome reporting for private animal rescues and sanctuaries that accept animals from public shelters or the public.

Animal rescues can be lifesaving partners. But lifesaving work must include accountability. When a public shelter transfers a dog, cat, or other animal to a private rescue, that animal should remain traceable until a final outcome is documented.

The current investigation into Miranda’s Rescue in Humboldt County shows why California needs stronger safeguards. The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office has reported recovering 117 intact canine remains, 21 canine skulls, hundreds of bones, and loose microchips during the investigation. Media reports have also cited hundreds of animals that remain unaccounted for after transfer or surrender to the rescue.

This is an active investigation, and criminal charges had not been filed as of recent reports. But California does not need to wait for a conviction to fix an oversight gap that leaves transferred animals vulnerable.

Please create a statewide licensing and inspection system for rescues and sanctuaries that receive animals from public shelters, accept public donations, or take in animals from the public. Require animal-level intake and outcome records, including microchip number, source, transfer date, medical status, location, foster placement, adoption, transfer, euthanasia, death in care, escape, or return to owner.

Please require public shelters to use written transfer agreements, verify that rescue partners are in good standing with state charity regulators, reconcile microchip data after transfer, and suspend transfers to organizations that fail to report outcomes or permit inspections.

California should also revive and strengthen shelter transparency legislation so shelters and rescues provide standardized public data on intake, transfers, adoptions, euthanasia, deaths in care, and other outcomes.

A rescue label should not create a blind spot. Donors, shelters, adopters, animal control officers, and the public deserve to know where animals go and what happens to them.

Most importantly, the animals deserve to be counted, protected, and accounted for.

Please act now to require private animal rescues to meet clear oversight and reporting standards.

Sincerely,