Thank you for signing!

Tell the EPA to Put Science First on Power Plant Pollution

28 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

0.09333333333333332% Complete

Sponsor: The Rainforest Site

The EPA repealed its biggest-ever climate safeguard for power plants. The rulemaking isn't over.

Several industrial smokestacks billow thick plumes of smoke against a vivid orange and red sunset sky over a city skyline.

In September 2026, the EPA formally repealed greenhouse gas emissions standards for fossil fuel power plants — what the agency itself called the largest deregulatory action ever taken in the power sector.1,6 The rollback eliminates limits that applied to both new and existing coal and gas plants, dismantling protections built on decades of scientific findings about climate pollution and its effects on human health.

What's at Stake for Public Health

Power plants burning coal and natural gas rank among the largest sources of greenhouse gas pollution in the United States. Research from the Environment America Research & Policy Center documents the outsized contribution the dirtiest of these facilities make to air quality problems and climate-related health risks.2 These are not abstract concerns. They translate directly into respiratory illness, heat-related disease, and compounding harm to communities — often the most vulnerable — living near plant operations.

Federal authority to regulate these emissions rests on an EPA "endangerment finding" — a formal scientific determination that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare. As the Harvard Environmental and Energy Law Program notes, that finding remains intact even as the rules built upon it have been stripped away.5 Repealing regulations does not erase the harm they were designed to prevent.

Aging Coal Plants Get a Longer Life

One direct consequence of this deregulation: aging coal plants can stay operational longer than they otherwise would have. According to Fortune, the rollback is driven in part by surging electricity demand from artificial intelligence data centers, with the administration leaning on extended coal plant operation to meet that demand.4 Without emissions requirements, plant operators face far less financial pressure to retire older, more polluting facilities.

Part of a Larger Pattern

This repeal does not stand alone. Former EPA officials, speaking to The Verge, identified roughly 30 federal environmental rollbacks since 2025 that collectively increase pollution risks — many tied to the expansion of electricity generation for AI infrastructure.3 The cumulative effect is a significant weakening of the regulatory framework communities near power plants have long relied on for basic protection. As NPR reported, the rules now removed represented some of the most consequential federal climate action targeting the electricity sector in U.S. history.1

Your Comment Can Make a Difference

EPA rulemaking requires the agency to weigh scientific evidence and public input before any decision becomes final. That process gives every citizen a legal avenue to demand that federal authority over power plant emissions be preserved — and that any final rule reflect the full body of climate health science, not industry pressure or short-term electricity politics.

Sign the petition now to urge the EPA Administrator to retain federal greenhouse gas regulation of fossil fuel power plants and base the final rule on the complete scientific record of climate's risks to public health.

More on this issue:

  1. Julia Simon, NPR (14 September 2026), "Trump's EPA repeals pollution limits on fossil fuel power plants."
  2. Environment America Research & Policy Center, Environment America Center (15 June 2022), "America's Dirtiest Power Plants."
  3. Alexis Dufresne, The Verge (14 September 2026), "Former EPA Officials Cite 30 Federal Rollbacks Since 2025 Boosting AI Data Center Pollution Risks."
  4. Jordan Blum, Fortune (15 September 2026), "Trump's 'largest deregulatory action ever' in the power sector will keep old coal plants online longer to power the AI boom."
  5. Harvard Environmental and Energy Law Program, Harvard Law School Environmental and Energy Law Program (14 September 2026), "Regulating Greenhouse Gases for New and Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants."
  6. NBC News Staff, NBC News (14 September 2026), "EPA to repeal limits on greenhouse gas pollution from power plants."

The Petition

To the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency,

I am writing to urge you to preserve federal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel power plants and to ensure that any final rulemaking is grounded in the full scientific record on climate-related risks to public health and welfare.

The EPA's September 2026 repeal of emissions standards for coal and natural gas plants — described by the agency itself as the largest deregulatory action ever taken in the power sector — removes protections that were built on decades of rigorous scientific findings. The endangerment finding that established EPA's legal authority to regulate these emissions under the Clean Air Act remains intact. That finding exists because greenhouse gases demonstrably threaten human health. Repealing the rules built upon it does not change the underlying science or erase the harm those rules were designed to prevent.

Power plants burning fossil fuels are among the largest sources of greenhouse gas pollution in the country. Research from the Environment America Research & Policy Center has documented the outsized contribution made by the dirtiest of these facilities to air quality problems and climate-related health risks. Those risks are not hypothetical. They manifest as respiratory illness, heat-related disease, and compounding harm to communities — often the most vulnerable — living near these facilities.

The rollback also has consequences for aging infrastructure. Without emissions requirements in place, coal plant operators face reduced pressure to retire older, more polluting facilities. Justifications tied to rising electricity demand from data centers and artificial intelligence cannot override the documented health costs borne by the public. Former EPA officials have identified roughly 30 federal environmental rollbacks since 2025, and the cumulative effect represents a serious weakening of the regulatory framework that communities have depended on for basic protection.

Compassion demands that we weigh the interests of people living near these plants, breathing the air affected by their output, and facing the long-term consequences of a warming climate. Scientific integrity demands that regulatory decisions not contradict the evidence that underpins the EPA's own legal mandate. The public comment process exists precisely to bring that evidence forward.

I urge you to retain federal greenhouse gas regulation of fossil fuel power plants and to base the EPA's final decision on the complete scientific record regarding climate's effects on health and welfare. Taking these actions will ensure a better future for all.

Sincerely,