Thank you for signing!

Stop Commercial Breeders From Hiding Behind Rescue Labels

105 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

0.35% Complete

Sponsor: The Animal Rescue Site

When you adopt a 'rescue' dog, you might actually be funding a puppy mill.

Several pit bull puppies crowd against the wire door of a metal crate, with two standing upright on their hind legs.

When you adopt from a rescue, you expect to be helping an animal in genuine need — one pulled from a shelter or surrendered by an owner who couldn't keep it. That expectation is being turned into a business model. A growing practice called "puppy laundering" allows commercial breeders, brokers, and dealers to sell animals to organizations that then present those animals to the public as rescues. The word "rescue" carries no enforceable legal definition in most states, so nothing stops them.2

How It Works

The transaction is simple: a rescue group pays a breeder or broker for dogs — the same exchange that defines a retail pet sale — and those animals get adopted out under a rescue label. Adopters pay fees that can rival or exceed pet store prices, believing they are giving a homeless animal a second chance. The ASPCA has identified this as a deliberate consumer scam.1 People who think they are avoiding puppy mills may actually be funding them.

While laundered animals fill those spots, dogs and cats with genuine placement needs compete for the same limited space and donor dollars. And because animals from high-volume commercial operations are more likely to carry undisclosed health and behavioral problems, families can face unexpected veterinary costs and grief they never saw coming.2

The Legal System Is Starting to Take Notice

A federal RICO lawsuit against a broker network known as JAKS Puppies was allowed to proceed after a court found sufficient grounds to examine alleged racketeering, fraud, and money laundering connected to the misrepresentation of dogs sold to the public.4 A separate federal case tied to Iowa breeders brought USDA enforcement into the picture — and exposed how difficult these schemes are to prosecute even when evidence of wrongdoing is substantial.3 The legal framework was never built to catch commercial fraud hiding behind the language of charity.

The Fix Is Specific and Achievable

Several states have already moved to close this loophole. The standard they set is clear: rescue organizations and shelters cannot purchase animals from breeders, dealers, or brokers and then market those animals as rescues. That prohibition removes the financial incentive that makes laundering profitable, protects consumers from deception, and preserves space and resources for animals that truly need rescue.1,2

Federal leadership or broader state-level action could extend that protection across the country. Without it, commercial breeders retain a quiet revenue stream — and the rescue label continues to shield operations that have nothing to do with rescue.

Animals and Honest Adopters Deserve Better

Legitimate rescue organizations depend on public trust. Every laundered animal erodes that trust and diverts support from the people doing this work with integrity. The loophole is real, the harm is documented, and the solution is straightforward.

Sign the petition now and tell Congress and state legislatures to prohibit shelters and rescue organizations from purchasing animals from commercial breeders, dealers, or brokers and presenting those animals to the public as rescues. Honest adopters — and animals in genuine need — are counting on it.

More on this issue:

  1. ASPCA Staff, ASPCA, "Scam Alert! What Is Puppy Laundering?."
  2. Companion Animal Advocates NJ, The Canine Corner, "Retail Rescue & Puppy Laundering Info."
  3. Clark Kauffman, Iowa Capital Dispatch (12 February 2025), "USDA seeks dismissal of puppy-laundering case involving Iowa breeders."
  4. Animal Legal Defense Fund, Animal Legal Defense Fund (29 January 2025), "Court Allows RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Puppy Mill Broker JAKS Puppies and Associates to Proceed."

The Petition

To the Speaker of the House, the Senate Majority Leader, and State Legislators:

We are writing to urge you to take immediate action against a deceptive practice that harms animals, deceives consumers, and undermines the integrity of the rescue community: the commercial sale of puppies and kittens through organizations falsely presenting those animals as rescues.

This scheme — widely called "puppy laundering" — works because the word "rescue" carries no enforceable legal definition in most states. Commercial breeders, brokers, and dealers exploit that gap by selling animals to organizations that adopt out those same animals as though they came from genuine rescue situations. The people who bring these animals home believe they are helping a pet in need. In reality, they may be funding the very high-volume breeding operations the rescue movement exists to oppose.

The ASPCA has classified this as a deliberate consumer scam. Federal courts are beginning to examine these operations for potential racketeering and fraud — a RICO lawsuit against a broker network accused of misrepresenting dogs to the public has been allowed to move forward. USDA enforcement actions connected to Iowa breeders have exposed how difficult these schemes are to prosecute even when evidence of wrongdoing is substantial. The system is struggling to catch up because the legal framework was never designed to address this kind of commercial misrepresentation hiding behind charitable language.

Beyond the fraud, there is a straightforward humanitarian concern. Dogs from high-volume commercial operations are more likely to carry undisclosed health and behavioral problems, leaving families with grief and financial hardship they never anticipated. And every laundered animal taking up space in a rescue organization is one fewer spot for a dog or cat with a genuine need for placement.

The solution is direct: prohibit rescue organizations and shelters from purchasing animals from breeders, dealers, or brokers and then presenting those animals to the public as rescues. Several states have already enacted protections along these lines. With federal leadership and broader state-level action, we can close this loophole in a way that defends honest adopters, strengthens legitimate rescue organizations, and cuts off a revenue stream that commercial breeders have quietly relied on for years.

Passing these protections will ensure a better future for animals, families, and the communities that care for them.

Sincerely,