Thank you for signing!

Protect Veterans' Disability Benefits From Being Cut To Fund Other Programs

25 signatures toward our 30,000 goal

0.08333333333333334% Complete

Sponsor: The Veterans Site

Congress wants to help veterans — by cutting $57 billion in disability benefits from other veterans.

A young man in military camouflage uniform sits in a wheelchair against a gray studio background, hands clasped together.

Congress is moving forward with the Take Care of America's Veterans Act (TCAVA) — broad legislation designed to expand support for those who served. Most of it has widespread backing. But buried inside is a single provision, Section 108, that has drawn fierce opposition from veterans organizations across the political spectrum. It would fund new veterans programs by cutting disability benefits for roughly 1.5 million future veterans.6,7

What Section 108 Does

The provision changes the formula used to calculate concurrent receipt — the ability of some veterans to collect both VA disability compensation and military retirement pay or Social Security. The result is a reduction in monthly disability payments for a large category of future beneficiaries. The cumulative cut would total $57 billion over time.6 That is not an accounting adjustment. It is money taken from veterans who were promised those benefits when they raised their hands to serve.

Supporters of the provision argue the savings offset the cost of other programs in the same bill. But that rationale is exactly what alarms advocacy groups. Once disability compensation becomes a funding mechanism, nothing prevents Congress from returning to that well every time it wants to expand veteran services without finding new money.3

Veterans Groups Are United in Opposition

The pushback is broad and bipartisan. A coalition of 15 major military and veterans organizations warned Congress that Section 108 would place a massive financial burden on future veterans.7 The provision could permanently alter how VA disability benefits are structured — transforming earned compensation into a budget line item to be trimmed as needed.3 Disabled American Veterans called it a condemnation-worthy proposal that breaks faith with those who served.6

Public opinion reflects the same rejection. A DAV survey found overwhelming opposition to using disability cuts to fund other veterans programs — among veterans and civilians alike.1 A separate analysis put opposition to Section 108 specifically at 71%.2 Veterans groups have made clear they support much of the rest of TCAVA, but view Section 108 as a dealbreaker that undermines the entire effort.5

The Senate Has Already Pushed Back

This fight has already reached the Senate floor. Senators blocked an earlier version of the bill over concerns about the disability offset mechanism, signaling that Section 108 remains the central obstacle to the legislation's passage.4 The path forward exists — but it runs through removing this provision, not around it.

The Core Problem

Disability compensation exists because veterans were injured in service to this country. It is not a discretionary fund to be raided when Congress needs revenue. The math is not complicated: you do not help veterans by taking money from other veterans.

Sign the petition now to demand that Congress strip Section 108 from TCAVA and permanently prohibit the use of veterans' disability compensation reductions to finance any future veterans programs.

The Petition

To the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and President pro tempore of the United States Senate, United States Congress; and Secretary of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Veterans Affairs

We are writing to urge you to remove Section 108 from the Take Care of America's Veterans Act (TCAVA) and to establish a firm prohibition against using reductions to veterans' disability compensation as a mechanism for funding new veterans programs.

The men and women who served this country did so under a promise — that if they were injured in that service, they would be taken care of. Disability compensation is not a discretionary benefit. It is an obligation, earned through sacrifice. Section 108 treats those payments as a budget resource to be drawn down, cutting concurrent receipt benefits for an estimated 1.5 million future veterans by a cumulative $57 billion over time. That is not a line item reduction. It is a broken commitment to people who gave their bodies, and in many cases their futures, in service to the rest of us.

What makes this provision particularly troubling is the precedent it would set. Once Congress establishes that disability compensation can be used to offset the cost of other programs — even well-intentioned ones — nothing prevents the same approach from being applied again. Veterans groups across the political spectrum have recognized this danger. A coalition of 15 major military and veterans organizations has warned Congress of the long-term consequences, and 71 percent of respondents in a recent survey — veterans and civilians alike — oppose funding new veterans programs by cutting disability benefits for other veterans. The Veterans of Foreign Wars, Disabled American Veterans, and many others have called Section 108 a dealbreaker, even as they express support for much of the rest of TCAVA. The Senate has already signaled its own reservations by blocking an earlier version of the bill over this same issue.

Helping veterans is a goal that unites Americans. But the way we fund that help matters. Stripping benefits from one group of veterans to pay for programs serving another is not compassion — it is a trade-off that no veteran should be asked to make. There is a better path: one that expands support without dismantling the foundation of earned compensation that millions of veterans depend on.

We urge you to act decisively, remove Section 108, and protect the integrity of veterans' disability benefits now and in the future — because doing so will help ensure a stronger, more just future for veterans, their families, and all Americans.

Sincerely,