Whistleblowers Reveal Years of Silent Suffering at Public Zoo
Matthew Russell
For decades, families visited the Holtsville Wildlife Ecology Center on Long Island, New York, expecting a safe refuge for injured or unreleasable animals. Yet a growing body of evidence paints a very different reality. Former staff, advocates, and veterinarians have described conditions that left animals distressed, untreated, and in some cases dead, setting off investigations and prompting local officials to plan the facility’s closure.
The center, operated by Brookhaven’s Highway Department, long relied on taxpayer funding while holding more than a hundred animals. It also operated with minimal veterinary capacity. Several accounts describe animals in visible decline while staff lacked the training or resources to intervene.

The Holtsville facility housed over a hundred animals with limited veterinary oversight.
Animals Caught in a System That Failed Them
Multiple sources point to repeated incidents in which suffering animals did not receive timely or appropriate care. A pig named Wilbur and a deer named Clarice were among numerous animals who died despite conditions that advocates say were treatable with proper veterinary oversight, according to World Animal Protection US.
Honey, a black bear kept since the late 1990s, became a symbol of the center’s deeper problems. She lived in a concrete enclosure, showed signs of psychological distress, and endured chronic medical issues. Advocates later described her final years as marked by confinement and neglect, former workers told CBS New York.
Other animals allegedly faced preventable harm: a mountain lion who drowned inside its enclosure, a duck treated for lead poisoning while the center pushed against medical advice, and farm animals left with unmanaged wounds or infections, News 12 Long Island reports.

Former employees said animals suffered from chronic neglect.
The Human Toll Within the Walls
Several employees said they left because they felt powerless to stop deteriorating conditions. Photographs later submitted to authorities showed overgrown hooves, emaciated animals, moldy feed, and cramped or unclean enclosures, according to CBS New York.
Some staff said they were discouraged from documenting deaths or raising alarms, claims echoed in whistleblower statements summarized by World Animal Protection US.
Despite town officials insisting the facility met inspection standards, the accounts of employees, advocates, and veterinarians collectively describe a system operating without the structure or expertise required to protect vulnerable animals.

Advocates documented deteriorating enclosures and untreated medical issues.
Accountability and a Turning Point
The mounting evidence pushed Brookhaven’s supervisor to request an investigation from the Suffolk County District Attorney, News 12 Long Island reports. The New York Department of Environmental Conservation also began reviewing the case.
As public pressure grew, the Town Board approved a budget that closes the zoo and relocates roughly 130 animals to sanctuaries and specialized facilities, according to Newsday. While officials emphasized financial constraints, years of documented neglect shaped public sentiment and accelerated calls for change.
Outside groups welcomed the decision, arguing the facility had long failed the animals it was entrusted to protect, Hoodline reports.
A Future Built on Better Choices
The Holtsville case highlights what happens when wildlife facilities operate without independent oversight or adequate medical care. The animals’ suffering was not caused by a single incident but by a structure that allowed problems to compound.
As the remaining animals await relocation, one truth emerges across every account: responsibility for their welfare extends beyond any one individual. It lies in the systems, budgets, and decisions that shape how captive wildlife lives each day.
Click below to make a difference.