U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Case on Post-9/11 GI Bill Benefits, Potentially Impacting 1.7 Million Veterans

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Case on Post-9/11 GI Bill Benefits, Potentially Impacting 1.7 Million Veterans

Pexels

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently announced that it will hear the case of Rudisill v. McDonough, which focuses on the handling of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This significant development has the potential to provide additional education benefits to approximately 1.7 million veterans. The case argues that service members who were enrolled in different versions of the GI Bill should be entitled to benefits under both programs, up to a maximum of four years.

Veterans may be eligible for educational benefits through programs like the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Photo: Pexels
Veterans may be eligible for educational benefits through programs like the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

James Rudisill's Battle for Benefits

James Rudisill, a former enlisted soldier and later a commissioned officer, utilized 25 out of his 36 months of eligibility under the Montgomery GI Bill to complete his undergraduate degree, Military.com reports. Following his service, Rudisill planned to pursue a theological education at Yale Divinity School, intending to utilize his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. He believed he had 23 months of additional education benefits under a Korean War-era law, which allows veterans to combine benefits from various programs for a total of 48 months.

However, the VA determined that Rudisill was only eligible for nine additional months, reaching a total of 36 months – the maximum allowable for each program. The VA cited the law that created the Post-9/11 GI Bill, stating that entitlement was limited to one program or the other, depending on the veteran's choice.

Rudisill took the matter to court, and a federal district court initially ruled in his favor. Nevertheless, the VA appealed the decision, and in 2021, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the ruling. The court opined that if a veteran had utilized some benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill and subsequently elected to receive benefits under the Post-9/11 program, the benefits would be limited to one or a partial month of entitlement under the Post-9/11 GI Bill for each month of unused benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill.

The GI Bill provides financial assistance for veterans pursuing higher education or vocational training. Photo: Pexels
The GI Bill provides financial assistance for veterans pursuing higher education or vocational training.

A Case for Clarity

Rudisill's legal team argues that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overlooked the comprehensive scope of the law and filed a petition to the Supreme Court, which has agreed to hear the case. According to Misha Tseytlin, an attorney with Troutman Pepper, the national law firm representing Rudisill, the appellate court failed to recognize the core protections established by the GI bills. These protections, dating back to the original GI Bill, aim to ensure that veterans who have served in multiple qualified periods can benefit fully from those periods of service, with a total entitlement of up to 48 months, reports Student Veterans of America.

”Post 9-11 GI Bill benefits are generous and have the ability to produce life-changing results for veterans and their families. The court’s decision ensures that our veterans have the opportunity to receive the full complement of educational benefits, as promised by Congress,” said David J. DePippo, a Dominion Energy attorney who also represented Rudisill.

Benefits under the GI Bill can be used for a wide range of educational programs, including degree programs, apprenticeships, and on-the-job training. Photo: Pexels
Benefits under the GI Bill can be used for a wide range of educational programs, including degree programs, apprenticeships, and on-the-job training.

Following the Supreme Court's announcement to review the case, Rudisill expressed his relief. He stated that he pursued the case not only for his own benefit but also for the veterans he served alongside in combat.

"It was just the right thing to do. Over and over again, the VA has shown me and my buddies that I went to Iraq and Afghanistan with ... that if they are not held to account, these kinds of transgressions they make against the demographic they supposedly support [will] continue to happen," Rudisill told Military.com.

Having served across three periods of active duty, Rudisill lost his spot at Yale but continued his theological education while working as a special agent for the FBI. He estimates that he may still have a year of education benefits left but emphasized that the fact that other veterans are facing similar situations has compelled him to continue the legal battle.

The Montgomery GI Bill is another educational assistance program available to veterans who served before the Post-9/11 era. Photo: Pexels
The Montgomery GI Bill is another educational assistance program available to veterans who served before the Post-9/11 era.

The Path Ahead

Rudisill's legal team is now preparing to submit a brief to the Supreme Court, to which the Justice Department will subsequently have the opportunity to respond.

The oral arguments for the case are expected to occur in November or December. As this legal battle unfolds in the Supreme Court, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the approximately 1.7 million veterans who could potentially benefit from extended education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, reports the American Legion.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has also called on the United States Supreme Court to grant review in Rudisill v. McDonough.

GI Bill benefits can often be transferred to a spouse or dependent child, providing them with educational opportunities. Photo: Pexels
GI Bill benefits can often be transferred to a spouse or dependent child, providing them with educational opportunities.

“Our veterans stepped up to protect our freedoms and safety, and we owe them a debt of gratitude that can never truly be repaid,” said Attorney General James. “The petitioner in this case, U.S. Army veteran James Rudisill, like thousands of other veterans, served our nation with distinction, and he has earned the educational benefits provided through the Post-9/11 GI Bill. I am proud to work with this bipartisan group of attorneys general to try and right this wrong before more veterans are denied the benefits they deserve.”

This case sheds light on the ongoing efforts to ensure that veterans receive the full range of benefits they are entitled to for their honorable service and sacrifices. The Supreme Court's decision will be eagerly awaited by veterans, legal experts, and advocates alike, as it has the potential to shape the future interpretation and administration of GI Bill benefits.

Take a stand for our veterans and support their full educational benefits. Click bellow to make a difference!

Matthew Russell

Matthew Russell is a West Michigan native and with a background in journalism, data analysis, cartography and design thinking. He likes to learn new things and solve old problems whenever possible, and enjoys bicycling, spending time with his daughters, and coffee.

Back to blog